Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit lobortis arcu enim urna adipiscing praesent velit viverra sit semper lorem eu cursus vel hendrerit elementum morbi curabitur etiam nibh justo, lorem aliquet donec sed sit mi dignissim at ante massa mattis.
Vitae congue eu consequat ac felis placerat vestibulum lectus mauris ultrices cursus sit amet dictum sit amet justo donec enim diam porttitor lacus luctus accumsan tortor posuere praesent tristique magna sit amet purus gravida quis blandit turpis.
At risus viverra adipiscing at in tellus integer feugiat nisl pretium fusce id velit ut tortor sagittis orci a scelerisque purus semper eget at lectus urna duis convallis. porta nibh venenatis cras sed felis eget neque laoreet suspendisse interdum consectetur libero id faucibus nisl donec pretium vulputate sapien nec sagittis aliquam nunc lobortis mattis aliquam faucibus purus in.
Nisi quis eleifend quam adipiscing vitae aliquet bibendum enim facilisis gravida neque. Velit euismod in pellentesque massa placerat volutpat lacus laoreet non curabitur gravida odio aenean sed adipiscing diam donec adipiscing tristique risus. amet est placerat.
“Nisi quis eleifend quam adipiscing vitae aliquet bibendum enim facilisis gravida neque velit euismod in pellentesque massa placerat.”
Eget lorem dolor sed viverra ipsum nunc aliquet bibendum felis donec et odio pellentesque diam volutpat commodo sed egestas aliquam sem fringilla ut morbi tincidunt augue interdum velit euismod eu tincidunt tortor aliquam nulla facilisi aenean sed adipiscing diam donec adipiscing ut lectus arcu bibendum at varius vel pharetra nibh venenatis cras sed felis eget.
This post is part one in a five part series on the problems with traditional project management tools. Stay tuned for more!
Project Management tools are easy to rag on — they’re one of those categories of software that are almost universally despised by the people who have to use them. The current standards, whether dedicated tools like Microsoft Project or co-opted tools like Excel and email, are in use more because they’re what we’ve always done rather than because they’re well-suited to solve people’s problems.
It’s worth digging in a little to really understand why that’s true. Those tools — at least the purpose-built ones — weren’t designed to be cruel torture devices or to waste massive amounts of time and money. For reference, according to the Project Management Institute’s 2017 global project management survey an average of US$97 million is wasted for every US$1 billion invested in project management. That’s not a great success rate.
We believe there are five things wrong with those tools and the philosophy behind them — this is the first post in a series that will explain each in turn.
Microsoft Project launched 33 years ago and it’s still the status quo of project management today. The world has changed a tremendous amount since then, with our businesses evolving into almost completely different environments, complete with radically new technologies and a greatly accelerated pace. It’s time for new tools that match the new rules.
The first version of Microsoft Project was released for MS DOS in 1984. Here’s a somewhat more recent screenshot of what it looked like:
The world has changed a lot in the intervening 33 years. That’s a lot of Gantt charts inflicted on hapless project teams. Thousands and thousands of person-years of status meetings. Some people’s entire careers have gone by since that fateful first release without any real change in the status quo.
The world your project management tools come from
Imagine how different running a project was three decades ago. Most people on the project team probably didn’t have computers on their desks, so many dots lost their lives to dot matrix printouts of endless project plans. The pace of business was notably slower because the technology simply didn’t support it going any faster. A waterfall Gantt chart was a pretty reasonable way to manage a group of people doing something together, especially if most of them were in the same physical location and teleconferences had yet to become a regular part of the day.
Fast forward to today. We have always connected supercomputers in our pockets. We’re online 24/7 and can videoconference in HD from almost anywhere on the planet. We’re chatting on Slack with people around the world while we collaborate through tools like SenseiOS® in real-time. It’s no big surprise that the old tools just aren’t up to managing today’s projects. It’s not the tools themselves that are the problem, but rather the underlying philosophy that you can actually manage or control a project that moves at the pace of today’s world.
